data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07fa6/07fa697713a3c97e1799b61ebeeb5cbdc625493d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8434/b8434550e24b918cc9aea53deab18c8601f4be1d" alt=""
Karen: What's good about this issue? Well, the art is pretty nice. Buckler is inked by Pablo Marcos and although I don't think it's a great combination, it works well enough. Buckler was clearly more inspired working on his own creation than on most of his other super-hero assignments. He moves the story along really well, with an almost cinematic verve.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84fe3/84fe369cacde03a020a5f8d50f332cb2f96fb72e" alt=""
Karen: I also found the continuing development of Deathlok's three personalities (Luther Manning, computer, and a hybrid of the two) to be intriguing. Many writers would have just gone with the two chief personalities- having the third one is a nice twist. Neither of the the main personalities seem to know what to make of it - when Manning asks the computer which of them "contributes the sick streak to our third personality?", the computer replies, "Both."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f370/9f370702eebc699306188052767998213da6114a" alt=""
Karen: We also get just a little bit more of this future world as we see more of a devastated New York. Food must be scarce, as there are apparently roving bands of cannibals in the streets. What, they didn't have any soylent green crackers?
Karen: While I think this was a failed experiment in terms of story structure, it still has its moments. It's also good to keep in mind that this book was produced in 1974 - as I mentioned in the first Deathlok review, this truly was a novel idea for comics. The struggle of Manning to assert his humanity over his condition would only become more important as the series went on.
Doug: Today's fare gets ya another look at a Bronze Age DC -- sometimes a scary proposition! The Brave and the Bold #136 from September 1977 brings us a Bob Haney-Jim Aparo not-so-masterpiece featuring Batman, Green Arrow, and the Metal Men.
What can I say about this one, except what Karen and I have said over and over -- when you're comparing Marvel and DC in the Bronze Age, there really is no comparison. I know I've complained at times about DC's mid-80's revamps of all of their characters, the descent into darkness, et al. BUT, given the characterization that came forward from that as opposed to what got left behind... I'll take it!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e560/4e56033110eee924bb396de53311018d7907ba7a" alt=""
The backstory to all of this is that allegedly Thaddeus Morgan had buried a time capsule under what is now the Wayne building. Ruby gets a court order to dig it up, and the capsule is found. However, bursting forth from it is this Jason dude, who is then attacked by another Jason Morgan. The first is revealed to be a robot, and Batman takes him to Doc Magnus. While the Doc and the Metal Men are assisting in the examination, the other Jason Morgan breaks in and steals "a certain parchment" (was I supposed to get that? 'Cause I didn't...). Tin is destroyed in the fracas, and later Batman is told by a judge that Jason Morgan is heir to the Morgan estate and that Batman is forbidden to harass him.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb6a7/eb6a799b16f60edecdc1db0eb0c02c115d383f47" alt=""
As Jason frees Batman from the snake's coils, the Caped Crusader tumbles out a window. All of a sudden (as fate would have it, you know) a green arrow shoots by, miraculously transforming into a hang glider. Batman clutches it and makes his way to the adjoining rooftop where he is greeted by the Emerald Archer himself. Nah, I couldn't make this up...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca0e4/ca0e4b5d63f5625d08858facce8063d5d9bd3458" alt=""
Needless to say, the tractor's dismantled, Jason Morgan's killed, Ruby's put behind bars, Bruce gets his building back, Tin is restored to half-life, and Doug had to take some Tylenol after reading this LAME story.
But isn't that what DC largely gave us in the Bronze Age?
2 comments:
Full disclosure: my own preference in the Bronze Age was also Marvel by a long shot, because I think the storytelling in most series was consistently better, with more solidly plotted and scripted stories. That said, I think your assessment of DC's Bronze Age output is a bit harsh. It would take too long to list all of the good stuff produced by DC in the 70s, but I recall enjoying a title like B&B more often than not (in fact, it was pretty much the only Batman series I read at least semi-regularly - although I admit Aparo's art had quite a bit to do with that...)
Edo --
Of course I was being (to some extent) tongue-in-cheek with my DC bashing. I, too, bought several stories in the 1970's that I thoroughly enjoyed. But as you stated, if I were to pick up a random Marvel fromthat era and compare it to a random DC from that era, the Marvel has a much better chance of being a better book.
The other factor in all of this is the lens of time. Things I really liked when I was 10-12 years old look somewhat unsofisticated and even dopey to a middle-aged man. I would suggest in that light, though, that my chances of feeling that way lie more on the DC side -- but that's because they made no bones about their target audiences. Marvel was aiming higher with their demographics.
And Legion and Secret Society aside (Detective Comics, too), this B&B story was pretty dumb!
:)
Doug
Post a Comment