Monday, August 20, 2012

Building a Better Krypton: The Man of Steel #1


The Man of Steel #1 (October 1986)
"From Out of the Green Dawn"
John Byrne-Byrne/Dick Giordano

Doug: As many of us had said earlier, I was surprised during our recent round of Bracketology that Crisis on Infinite Earths bested the deaths of Gwen Stacy and the Green Goblin in the semi-finals. Today we'll begin a six-week examination of the fall-out from the Crisis -- the re-imagining of Superman, as told by John Byrne in the bi-weekly series The Man of Steel. Byrne was among the hottest creators in comics in 1986, having come off of lengthy runs on the X-Men and Fantastic Four. DC Comics wasn't afraid to go after some big names for their revisionist histories, handing the reins of the revamps to Byrne, Frank Miller (Batman), George Perez (Wonder Woman), Green Arrow (Mike Grell), Hawkman (Tim Truman), and the Justice League (J.M. DeMatteis/Keith Giffen/Kevin Maguire). Obviously you're sitting there reading a blog about the Bronze Age -- this series will look at what came next, for better or for worse.

Karen: I haven't looked at this series in a very long time. I don't recall feeling strongly one way or another when I read it originally. My main concern was that Superboy had been wiped out of existence, and that affected the Legion. I've never been a Superman fan.

Doug: That's an excellent point, and one that made me sad. Personally, I quit buying the Legion after Superboy #259 when little Clark got kicked out of his own book. To be honest, that time coincided with my cold turkey dropping of all comics, but I'll admit that I was very concerned that the Legion was going it alone after that story.

Karen: Well, the Legion's never been the same since Crisis, but that's a discussion for another time.

Doug: I'll be reading and scanning from the original issues, but did want to mention that I was a winner in the trade paperback raffle back in 1987. As I recall, readers could submit entries to each of the Superman mags being published at that time: Superman, Adventures of Superman, and Action Comics. I think I sent in 3-4 entries to each comic. How surprised do you think I was to get an unexpected package at college one day? I could not believe it! In case you've never seen one, DC basically bound the six issue mini-series. The stock used is the same as DC's covers and interior pages were printed on.

Karen: You lucky guy! I dug out my comics for this one.

Doug: Our story is divided into three parts: a prologue and two chapters. We pick it up on a Krypton far different from the one depicted by Wayne Boring, Curt Swan, et al. This is a highly advanced/evolved Krypton, where human emotion has been squelched for centuries. The Kryptonians are masters of their planet, controlling every aspect of their lives -- even down to when it rains. We meet Jor-el, a scientist troubled by impending events on his planet. Jor-el is served by two small robots (droids) who have the ability to converse with him and each other, and to follow directives. One says to the other that their master seems troubled; the response is that while all Kryptonians have been acting apprehensively, it is not in the programming to know why. This is our first clue that there seems to be little emotion on this planet.

Karen: Yes, this was certainly not the Krypton I was familiar with, although my knowledge of Superman and his mythos mostly came from the Superman films and my uncle's 50s and 60s Superman comics. That Krypton was also technologically advanced, but seemed a much warmer, human place. Byrne's decision to go with a cold, sterile version of Krypton seems an odd choice. Jor-El and Lara's wardrobes reflect this as well -almost every inch of skin is covered.


Doug: We see Jor-el next standing in front of a globe, or pod. He had instructed his servants to place "the matrix" within an orb in his laboratory. As he reaches out a hand toward the encased fetus, the Lady Lara enters. It's pretty obvious that although they are married and this is their child, there was no sexual contact whatsoever in the creation of the baby. Jor-el speaks of Krypton's impending doom, and of a civilization failed. Lara rebukes him, and questions his speech as archaic. But Jor-el tells her what he knows: the planet is going to explode due to pressures rising within its crust. While the matrix could not survive, even in the pod, it could survive after a journey through hyperspace. Lara is incredulous, but we're again aware that there doesn't seem to be a real motherly attachment. Jor-el says that he has scanned the heavens and found a suitable planet for which to send the baby -- Earth. He shows Lara an image of middle-America, and she recoils at the site of a bare-chested farmer. Again, it's obvious that any coupling between Jor-el and Lara took place in a test tube.

Karen: This lack of humanity and feeling (Jor-El is an anomaly) makes the death of Krypton seem a bit less sad -call me insensitive but the Kryptonians don't seem to be really living.

Doug:  I think it's interesting that in wiping away the 50-year backstory of Krypton, we're left only with these few sterile images.  I suppose we are to assume that they could do anything, so whether or not ore was their industry or service-type jobs is a moot point.  This is it, face value.

Doug: Jor-el says that due to the energy of Earth's yellow sun, the child will grow up with extraordinary powers; Lara interprets that as her superior Kryptonian son subjugating the savages of Earth's primitive culture. Jor-el is a bit more open-minded. Suddenly the eruptions begin to ravage Krypton's surface. Jor-el wastes no time in launching the escape pod. As it leaves, the planet begins to quake and groan; Jor-el says to Lara that he is glad that they will face the end in each other's company. As the rocket exits, the planet indeed explodes, and we see a small shard of Krypton reaching the tail of the rocket, and lodging itself there.

Karen: Ah yes, foreshadowing...

Doug: Chapter One opens on a high school football field, where young Clark Kent is leading his team to victory -- by scoring his 10th touchdown of the game! This ain't yer daddy's Clark Kent! We meet Jonathan Kent, near the sideline as the Smallville coach is about to explode in the "thrill of victory". Yet Pa Kent seems a bit dour. The game ends, and Clark comes off the field on his classmates' shoulders. But his teammates don't seem as jubilant. Pa steps forward and interrupts Clark before he leaves with his friends. Clark initially offers to talk later, but Pa's having none of it. They eventually leave the school, as some clouds start to roll in. Pa said it was time they had a talk, and begins to relate a story we are by now very familiar with: how Jonathan and Martha Kent saw a bright light in the Kansas sky, followed it out to one of their fields, found a rocket ship with a baby inside, and adopted the child. John Byrne adds a few updates along the way, such as (I believe) the blizzard that crippled the heart of Kansas for an entire winter; it wasn't a tough sell to the townsfolk when Martha appeared in the spring with a new baby.

Karen: Both when I first read this, and now, I found it odd that Clark was a super-star athlete. I know Byrne was trying to differentiate his version of Clark from what had gone before, but it just doesn't make sense to me that his parents, knowing his vast power, would allow him to potentially harm other kids. The idea that Ma and Pa had to take Clark aside and tell him that he had to pretend to be a nerd, basically, seems much more likely. 


Doug: We then see young Clark start to mature, from a toddler to an elementary-aged child. Along the way there are amazing feats, miracles, and other just unexplainable incidents that occur. While Jonathan and Martha realize that something is amiss, they try to keep Clark as grounded as possible. This explains why as a teen Clark was proud of his accomplishments on the gridiron, but wouldn't be characterized as big-headed. I think in this "origin" section of the origin story, Byrne crafts for the reader the roots of Superman as the "Boy Scout", fighting for "truth, justice, and the American way". It's pretty obvious that he's been raised with "Midwestern values", and has taken this teaching to heart. Eventually Clark realizes that he can fly -- for a really nice rendition of a man suddenly able to leave the ground, I'd encourage you to see Kurt Busiek's and Stuart Immonen's Superman: Secret Identity. As we take leave of the site where Jonathan had hidden the rocket ship, we see Clark suddenly take ill. Of course, we know it's due to the chips of his home planet, stuck throughout the nooks and crannies of the ship. But, who is the mystery man lurking in the shadows on this rainy Friday evening?

Karen: I got a different impression of Clark here, in that I did feel he was egotistical and a bit of a jerk. However, by the time Pa has explained things to him, he's talking about his responsibilities to the world. This seemed like an awful fast u-turn to me. I just didn't buy it.

Doug: Clark's personality as an adolescent is not revisited, so the adult altruistic Clark is all we'll have to work with.  We enter Chapter Two in the Kent kitchen as Jonathan comes down for breakfast. Martha has her scrapbooks out, and muses over all of the headlines Clark has generated through his activities over the past seven years. Seven years! I guess I was a bit surprised that Byrne chose to make Clark 25 in this story. I don't know if I felt he should have been older or younger, but once Superboy was taken out of the equation the age of 25 does seem to be a bit old for a Super-debut. As Jonathan opens his daily paper, he sees yet another headline of a mysterious "Superman" who saved a disabled space plane. Suddenly, there are creaks in the floor boards above them -- in Clark's room! Hustling up the steps, shotgun in hand, Pa and Ma burst into the room to find... a brooding Clark. Clark's depressed and confused, and begins to relate what had happened as the space plane had gotten into trouble.

Karen: It's much like what happens in the original Superman film, isn't it? Except there's no trip to the Arctic. Also, check your glasses pal: that's no shotgun -looks more like an ax handle to me.

Doug:  Obviously you've never been to Smallville and checked out an artillery store.  Actually you caught me trying to write from memory without opening the book back up.  Duh to me.  And really, it looks like a large utensil for use with a cauldron suspended within a fire place.  We use those all the time...  But we can go with ax handle.

Doug: In flight over Metropolis, everything seemed to be going well when suddenly a small civilian craft got too close and clipped the tail of the space plane (this is obviously pre-9/11, as any craft like that would be taken out of the sky by an F-16 escort). Clark had been in the crowd of spectators watching in horror as the big vessel tipped and began its nosedive. Streaking up from the ground, with no concern for his secret identity, Clark was able to right the plane. However, little did he know that onboard was not only the crew, but intrepid reporter Lois Lane. As the plane was stabilized and brought in for a landing, the crew had become aware that it was a flying man who was saving them. Never one to miss a story, Lois was first off the plane and accosted our young hero with a "Hold it right there, Buster!" Clark was taken aback, so much so that he didn't fly off. Their eyes met, a little chemistry began to brew, and then the crowds set in. The sense of claustrophobia was more than Clark could take.

Karen: Again, I had a feeling of deja vu for the Superman film, as Clark saves the plane here too. Although no one here said, "We got something. I'm not saying what it is, but trust me." I like Lois' look here -in fact, Byrne does a nice job with both Lois and Clark. Giordano's inks really complement his pencils.

Doug:  With Man of Steel, I think it was safe to say Byrne felt that the Superman movie was canon. Back in Smallville, Ma stitched a garment on her sewing machine as Pa and Clark entered the room. What we are seeing is a quick-hitter in the evolution of the Superman costume. Pa and Clark made the famous shield, while Ma came up with the color scheme. Ma also gets credit for noticing that clothes worn close to the skin never seemed to tear when Clark was playing as a child -- hence the skin-tight costume. She also gets credit for the boots. Pa came up with that brilliant disguise of wearing... eyeglasses with slicked-back hair. Uh huh. And then we get what can only be called a majestic last-page splash. Wow.

Karen: The idea that Superman has some sort of a protective force shield close to his skin I think originated with science fiction writer Larry Niven, of whom I have heard Byrne is a big fan. Niven is a proponent of the idea that all of Superman's abilities are really mental-telekinesis for flight and super-strength, force field projection for invulnerability, etc. We see this idea put to use by Byrne for the character of Gladiator when he had him appear in Fantastic Four. I don't think it was ever really stated that this was true for all of Superman's powers in the Byrne run though. And yes, you just have to roll your eyes and accept that no one can tell Clark and Supes are the same guy.

Doug: I really got excited re-reading this story for the review. It brought back a lot of memories I'd not felt in 25 years. I've talked often on the blog about my love of Superboy and utter disdain for Superman. But here, in this series, was a Man of Steel I could begin to embrace. Byrne grounded Clark Kent in the real world and brought his power levels down to the point where he was no longer a god. This was infinitely more appealing than his Silver Age personna as a do-everything. I just liked this a lot better. And overall, this sense of newness running throughout the DC Universe was very fresh, a true jumping-on point.



12 comments:

david_b said...

Thanks for your reviews, Doug and Karen. I agree this Byrne-drawn series was well drawn, taking us back to the basics as Byrne intended, but a few knocks here..:

1) It seemed very clean, dry and antiseptic. I know that's partially Byrne's style during that period (looking at his final years doing FF), so it came across very bland. Agreeing with Karen, it's like Byrne tried to stretch the 'alien-aspect' of Krypton as much as possible, without compromising too much of existing canon.

2) As with all revamps, it put the nails in all Supes history before then which is sad because there were some good stories. Out at the same time as Legends (which I liked a tad more), it seemed to dull down a lot of built-in mystique you could have drawn upon but is lost when 'the chalkboard's wiped clean.'

DC was determined to grab Byrnes alright, along with other biggies to retool everything since '85's Crisis series. The results didn't stir my interest to continue collecting after an ish or two, other than Wally as the new Flash for a half-dozen issues, and the new, ridiculously-fun Justice League, which is probably the BEST post-Crisis idea DC had going...

Garett said...

When I think of Krypton, it's the movie version, with the cool black and white glowing crystal look. Or the peppy Shuster version. I'd like to see that movie version in comic form.

Byrne/Giordano were a pretty good combo--looking forward to the rest of the review. My favorite Superman artist is Garcia Lopez, who drew a couple of good Elseworlds stories.

J.A. Morris said...

I just re-read this tbp last night in preparation.

Karen brings up a good point about Clark injuring others in football. I imagine he could run through tacklers to death.

I still enjoy it for the most part, but am I the only person who thought the Jor-El/Kara scene was a bit wordy & went on forever?

Edo Bosnar said...

I read this series as it came out, after a roughly 2-year hiatus from comics. Hadn't read Crisis (still haven't), but I was really curious about the Superman revamp, plus I was a big fan of anything done by Byrne. Whatever one thinks the DC reboot at the time, you have to admit it seemed like a shot in the arm for many titles and characters that seemed to have gotten tired by that time (although it did pretty much screw up LoSH beyond repair), and I think none were more tired than DC's flagship character. By the early 80s, about the only Superman stuff I read from time to time was DC Comics Presents and the occasional annual or special.
For the most part, I thought this was pretty good - I think Byrne, Wolfman et al. did a nice job of retooling the Superman mythos while still being respectful of tradition. One of the things I think I liked best - and it seems both of you disagree with me - is the total overhaul of Krypton. The idea of it being a sort of antiseptic anti-Utopia just appealed to my inner SF geek, I guess. Also, this concept provided the grist for some really good Elseworlds stories later - esp. Steve Gerber's Last Son of Earth.
And yes, I agree, as much as Byrne tried to make it look plausible, there's still no way anybody could not tell Superman apart from Clark Kent...

dbutler16 said...

I really enjoyed this series. I thought it was well written, I enjoyed Byrne's fresh, and relatively realistic, take on the Superman mythos. I also loved the art. I like Byrne's art to much better when somebody other than John Byrne inks him.

Chris said...

I had no preconceived ideas about Superman despite being a comic reader for ten years at that point because I'd never picked up a DC until then.

Yes..I know. But older kids had told me that the stories were boring because Superman was too powerful and after watching the first movie, it certainly seemed like they were telling the truth.

However, I was a huge Byrne fan at the time and despite being upset at him leaving the FF, I follwed him to DC. I remember Byrne once saying that he had about 20,000 followers as sales on titles he switched to went up by roughly that amount.

So I loved the issue. It was all new, fresh and exciting to me.

One thing I regret though. I bought the direct market cover but I wish I'd gone for the newstand version as it fits with the others in the series.

I reckon more direct market edition copies were sold too. Anybody know any details?

Fred W. Hill said...

Like Karen, I was never a big fan of Superman, and actually the first DC series I ever collected was Saga of the Swamp Thing, a few months into Alan Moore's run. By the time Man of Steel came out, I'd bought quite a few other DC titles and I decided to check out what Byrne was doing with ol' Supes. I'd read his first origin story in Jules Fieffer's book about comicbook superheroes which I'd picked up from a used book store a few years previously, and I'd also read the Not-Brand Echh parody as well as Gerber's spoof in one of his Man-Thing stories. I was also generally familiar enough with the Superman mythos that it struck me as odd that Clark Kent would only learn of his powers and origin as a near adult(well, there goes all those Superboy stories!). Some of the elements in Byrne's depiction of Krypton now strike me as reminiscent of John Buscema's rendering of Zenn-La, the Silver Surfer's homeworld, but then I'm sure Buscema's version of an advanced alien world was pretty much like that of those imagined in EC sci-fi comics or various films and serials of previous decades.
I stuck around for the mini-series and bought a few of Wolfman's take on the new Superman, but this was all around the time I was mostly weaning myself off of superhero comics. Byrne's Superman couldn't keep me interested, but later on, Gaiman's Sandman did keep me coming back for more.

William said...

Awesome review. At the time this series came out it quickly became one of my favorites. I am a huge John Byrne fan, and I pretty much would pick up any title he was working on.

Oh and Chris it was supposedly 40,000 (not 20,000) loyal fans that would follow Byrne from title to title. He called them "Byrne Victims". I suppose I was one of them.

I had never been the world's biggest Superman fan (except for the movies) because he was just too damn powerful. In fact, at some times ridiculously so. But when I saw that Byrne was taking over the character I was definitely willing to give it a shot, and I was not sorry I did. In fact, while JB was on the title it was near the top of my list of must read books. However, when he left a couple of years later, so did I. I still have a great fondness for Superman based solely on this era of his history.

That being said, I didn't absolutely love every idea Byrne had regarding Superman. For instance the whole "skintight forcefield" notion. Superman is the "Man of Steel" dammit! Not the "Man of Forcefield." The idea that his near invulnerability is the result of some kind of forcefield instead of his skin being super tough (like steel) changes the fundamental nature of his powers a little too much for my taste. Karen mentioned that she thinks Byrne was maybe basing Superman's powers on some kind of telekineses. That is actually addressed later in the mini-series when Superman lifts an ocean liner out of the water and thinks to himself that he seems to be able to lift more weight when he's flying than when he's standing on the ground. Which makes it seem that is powers are somewhat mental in nature. I don't care for that idea at all. Luckily, I don't recall the notion ever really being brought up again during the course of Byrne's run on the series.

Later on after the "Death" of Superman when the new Superboy came along. (You know the hip, cool one with the shades and the leather jacket), he derived his powers from "tactile telekinesis". So, apparently someone thought that was a good idea and went with it.

When all is said and done, John Byrne's Superman is still just about the only version of character that I ever really cared for. That is until the Bruce Timm Animated Series. But it's obvious they based most of that show on Byrne's Superman. (Except for the forcefield thing).

Fantastic Four Fan 4ever said...

For me this was the definitive vision of Superman by John Bryne. For some reason a comment he made to Time Magazine got him pulled from his assignment. Do any of our readers know what that comment was? I eagerly awaited each issue and purchased the trade when it was released. I remember it was around 1986 when this series was released. About the same time as the Watchmen and Dark Knight. I was hoping Bryne would get at least a ten year run out of this character but that wasn’t meant to be. The closest this title came to Bryne’s legacy? It was when Jerry Ordway took over as artist. Since the “Death of Superman”, which was hit and miss for me, I stopped reading soon after.

Anthony said...

I'll quote John Byrne from Comics Interview 71 from 1989

Byrne : ... I hated that Time cover ...

Interviewer : Why do you hate the Time cover ?

Byrne : Because I didn't write the copy for it. I wrote a balloon, a suggestion of what he would say, so that it would actually lead into the two page spread that was inside, and then they wrote copy that was, I thought, weak and terribly lettered. This is when you see what the real power of comic books is, is we have people who know what they're doing. I mean Superman referring to his supernatural powers ? He doesn't have supernatural powers, guys, he's got super human powers - there's a world of difference. But the real world doesn't care. Also the Time article was that it was in the " Entertainment " section, it wasn't in the " Publishing " section where I thought it should be. The least they could have done was to have done it as an article about publishing. But it wasn't, it was " Entertainment " and it had pictures from the movies and pictures from the TV show. and " Oh, by the way, it's a comic book. "

William said...

This is from John Byrne's own lips on why he quit Superman.

"DC hired me to revamp Superman, and then immediately chickened out. They backed off at the first whiff of fan disapproval, which came months before anyone had actually seen the work. During the whole two years I was on the project, although nothing happened that was not approved by DC editorial, there was no conscious support. They even continued to license the "previous" Superman. At one point, Dick Giordano said "You have to realize there are now two Supermen -- the one you do and the one we license." Seemed counter-productive, to say the least, since far more people saw the licensed material. After two years of this nonsense, I was just worn down. The fun was gone."

Earth66 said...

I really liked this Superman. I enjoyed the stripped down to basics of the character. His first meeting of Batman was refreshing.

However....

They destroyed my LSH. That was always my faorite read. The LSH never recovered and I stopped reading after Threeboot.
I hear the new LSH with Levitz is pretty good, but Im done.

Related Posts with Thumbnails