data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcc21/dcc2146885d6ea8697c88683b624d1c73b1c4e37" alt=""
“…and Now, the Goblin!”
Stan Lee/Gil Kane-John Romita
Doug: OK, Faithful Ones, after a few in-betweener posts on the Code and what was going on back in those frightful days of 1968-1971, it’s back to the comics! We kick off our last three posts (whew! Looks like it will be a total of 10 on this topic!) with an examination of Stan Lee’s decision to publish the so-called “drug issues” outside the parameters of the Comics Code Authority, before it was subsequently revised.
Doug: As we go through this, keep in mind that the last post in this series covered The Spectacular Spider-Man #2, published in November 1968 – 2 ½ years before ASM #96 hit the stands. And while we discussed how “psychedelic drugs” were used in the story, there was no conflict with the Code, as that comic was actually a magazine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5458f/5458fac0863537854e1d02e82a191386713ca511" alt=""
Karen: I agree with you about enjoying the story despite the absence of super-heroics early on. I think Spidey’s personal life was always a huge draw for readers. Peter had all the problems the rest of us did, likely more. He was a great Everyman with whom most people could readily sympathize.
Karen: I also enjoyed the art on this issue. My first issue of Spider-Man was #98, which we’ll be getting to shortly. But I was also reading Marvel Tales concurrently, and ever since those days, in my head when I see Spidey it’s always Romita’s version. With him providing the inks on Kane’s work, it was not jarring to go from the reprint to the regular title!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35edd/35edd09fd9974d6452e6eeadf10605c36276074a" alt=""
Doug: Speaking of the aforementioned Spectacular Spider-Man, there is no mention of that story in ASM #96. The only references made to Norman Osborn’s having been the Green Goblin and having at one time known Spider-Man’s secret identity are from a page of flashbacks to ASM #40.
Doug: The first half of the book is about Peter Parker and his various dilemmas: no money, Gwen’s in London but he couldn’t see her because why would Peter and Spidey both be in London, Robbie Robertson may be on to Pete’s secret, Aunt May is trying to be “hep”, etc. It’s pretty standard angst from Stan’s typewriter, but you know what? I love it! I don’t read Spider-Man comics anymore, but I don’t much care for the goings-on I’ve heard about. THIS is my Spider-Man!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a621/6a62146fcac3d24b4ef474d9fe89be5747914d0e" alt=""
Doug: But, the interview goes well, Pete garners a part-time job, and Norman offers to pay Pete’s way to the theatre later that evening where the gang will be watching Mary Jane’s off-Broadway debut. But before heading over, Pete decides to change into his Spidey suit and follow a couple of squad cars that are heading to a call.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7056/f705627099b46256a2b5139d1d794c21c17fa4f7" alt=""
Karen: Even though Stan himself has admitted he did no research for this story (or any other, from what he says), the incident with the freaked out kid on the roof plays very seriously, even when Peter makes a little speech afterwards about the evils of drugs. I don’t know what sort of drug Stan thought would cause that kid to go up on a roof like that, but the fall could really be seen as a metaphor for the damage drugs can do to one’s life.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b899/8b89965a274a2b6bb8786c7cd078639bc292a71f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ad53/8ad533656daca3531162cd90aaca03126ed99cc3" alt=""
Karen: More social commentary from Stan, which might seem hokey now, but I’m sure it was surprising back then. I have always been impressed with the way Stan and the Bullpen made sure to work black characters into stories. When you open a Marvel comic from this era, you’ll see not only black supporting characters like Randy and Joe Robertson, but backgrounds with black cab drivers, policemen, firemen, etc. There was a real effort on Marvel’s part to show society in all its facets. With Randy, we see his frustration, but he doesn’t come across as a one-dimensional “angry young black man”.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73d20/73d20b4d8dac21b741a84a55c3bb463326694c8d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3b8b/b3b8bc1a9907df0850991a7a80df94fe151e5931" alt=""
Doug: After the show is over and everyone’s saluted MJ’s efforts, Norman and Peter find excuses to head their separate ways. You can see where this is headed, and it ain’t good!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dee91/dee91ee3c4759af4d09a23b7c8cae0bfc13c4868" alt=""
6 comments:
The fact that the two SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN stories were not actually in continuity was driven home a bit later when issue one was reprinted (with extensive changes!) in the regular Spidey title. This was very confusing to those of us paying attention as the story of Richard Raleigh had strangely already been tied to DAREDEVIL several years earlier at that point as I recall! Issue two, one of my favorite Spider-Man stories, was just never mentioned again as far as I know.
Frustrating, wasn't it, Steve?
We've all known stories of Stan's poor memory, but to think that he'd written a MAJOR Green Goblin story only a few years before our story-at-hand and chose to ignore it is very strange. And you'll see as we get to the next review in the series, of ASM 97, how incredulous I was that Stan used some of the same plot devices with no mention of Spidey thinking to himself, "Well, let's try this again, because it worked for me last time!".
But like you also said, all of this doesn't take away from the fact that Spectacular Spider-Man #2 contained a great story, with Johnny Romita at the very top of his game -- perhaps never a better job on his part on any other Spider-Man story.
Thanks for the comments!!
I absolutely loved the drug issues. In fact, that whole period from about 50-150 is just so good it blows my mind. I really like watching MJ turn from the shallow, manipulative flirt into a more adult woman. One of my favorite moments in all of comics is the look on MJ's face at the end of the whole "Death of Gwen" story as she almost leaves, then doubles back to be with Pete. Just gives me chills.
True, Chris -- a very poignant scene. Karen (and others) have remarked that over the passage of time, MJ took on many of Gwen's characteristics. She became more likeable as the years passed.
Karen takes MJ to task in our upcoming two posts that conclude the Revised Code series, however!
Hey, I won't argue that, initially, she was a royal pain in the hiney. Flighty as all get out and shallow as they come. But I'm okay with her becoming more Gwen-like, in that in this case Gwen-like means mature, responsible adult.
I maintain that the problem with MJ's character wasn't that she married Pete, it's that the 90's happened and she just froze. No movement at all, plus occasional highly annoying bouts of returned shallowness. Once you hit Maximum Carnage, it's just a constant cycle of "Stop being Spider-Man, It's okay your Spider-Man, Stop, Okay, Stop, Okay" until you want to scream. Then they kill her off, bring her back but separate them, and then JMS finally makes her interesting again.
Then One More Day happened. Sigh.
Wouldn't you say 39-150 instead of 50-150?
Post a Comment